1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Sixty | Cruze |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2685 mm |