1963 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 95 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette (488 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1963 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Chevrolet Corvette | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Corvette | Renown |
Year Released | 1963 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2750 mm |