1963 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 167 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette (488 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1963 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Chevrolet Corvette | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Corvette | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 132 L |