1963 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2000 Holden GTS-R
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. (488 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Chevrolet Corvette.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Chevrolet Corvette | 2000 Holden GTS-R | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Corvette | GTS-R |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 644 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |