1963 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 440 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Chevrolet Corvette | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Corvette | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 50 L |