1963 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 247 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette (488 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Chevrolet Corvette 2009 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Corvette 3
Year Released 1963 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5353 cc 1598 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 488 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.6 mm 83.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1375 kg 1128 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]