1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 1984 Renault R5

To start off, 1984 Renault R5 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,527 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Renault R5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Renault R5 (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Renault R5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Renault R5 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1963 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Renault R5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Renault R5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Renault R5 (76 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 1984 Renault R5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: