1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 489 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 606 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2CV | CLS |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 24 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 80 L |
