1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2006 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | 2CV | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 423 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 24 Nm | 174 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 90 L |