1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 339 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 506 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | 2CV | UTE |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 423 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 24 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
