1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 1101 kg more than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (330 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | C70 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 423 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 24 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1661 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 68 L |