1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2009 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC70 (236 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 423 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 24 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 70 L |
