1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | 2CV | Colorado |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 423 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 24 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |