1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2011 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2011 Seat Exeo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Seat Exeo (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Seat Exeo weights approximately 840 kg more than 1963 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Seat Exeo (148 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2011 Seat Exeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen 2CV | 2011 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | 2CV | Exeo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 423 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 24 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2642 mm |