1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (187 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (440 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2CV | R |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 423 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 24 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5156 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1661 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3216 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 80 L |
