1963 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Citroen | Peugeot |
| Model | 2CV | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 423 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1359 mm |
