1963 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1963 Citroen Ak 350 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Holden FX (51 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 365 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ak 350 | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | Ak 350 | FX |
Year Released | 1963 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2620 mm |