1963 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1998 Volvo C70
To start off, 1998 Volvo C70 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volvo C70 (162 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volvo C70 weights approximately 795 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ak 350 | 1998 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ak 350 | C70 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |