1963 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1835 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (391 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ak 350 | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
Model | Ak 350 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |