1963 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 425 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ak 350 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ak 350 | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |