1963 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo C70 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo C70 weights approximately 1087 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ak 350 | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ak 350 | C70 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 190 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |