1963 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen Ak 350 | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | Ak 350 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3040 mm |
