1963 Citroen Ami vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1963 Citroen Ami is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Talbot T 26 (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen Ami | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Citroen | Talbot |
| Model | Ami | T 26 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 600 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |
