1963 Citroen Ami vs. 1955 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1963 Citroen Ami is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Isuzu Minx (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 340 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ami | 1955 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | Ami | Minx |
Year Released | 1963 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2370 mm |