1963 Citroen Ami vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ami | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ami | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4690 mm |