1963 Citroen Ami vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 2242 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (174 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ami | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ami | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 21.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 2862 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 80 L |