1963 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2008 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,099 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 865 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar X-Type (200 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ami | 2008 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | Ami | X-Type |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 2099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 42 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 61 L |