1963 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ami | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | Ami | Colorado |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 42 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |