1963 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 572 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ami | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1192 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |