1963 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen Ami | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Ami | C70 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 600 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
