1963 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen Ami | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | Ami | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 600 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |
