1963 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 831 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ami | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 42 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |