1963 Citroen DS vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Citroen DS weights approximately 112 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen DS | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | DS | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2730 mm |
