1963 Citroen DS vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 120 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen DS | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Puma |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 42 L |