1963 Citroen DS vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Citroen DS weights approximately 22 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen DS | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | DS | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 55 L |
