1963 Citroen DS vs. 2000 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2000 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Cherokee (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 150 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen DS | 2000 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | DS | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2580 mm |