1963 Citroen DS vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Citroen DS weights approximately 605 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen DS | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Citroen | Lotus |
| Model | DS | M250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 72 L |
