1963 Citroen DS vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (206 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Citroen DS | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | DS | C70 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 68 L |
