1963 Citroen DS vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (144 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 497 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen DS | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | DS | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2427 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 70 L |