1963 Citroen DS vs. 2006 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2006 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hyundai Matrix (102 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 6 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen DS | 2006 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Hyundai |
Model | DS | Matrix |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 55 L |