1963 Citroen DS vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 982 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Citroen DS weights approximately 40 kg more than 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Because 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen DS | 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Citroen | Koenigsegg |
Model | DS | CCXR |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 22 L/100km |