1963 Citroen DS vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen DS | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | DS | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 33 L |