1963 Citroen DS vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 235 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen DS | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Citroen | Chrysler |
Model | DS | Sebring |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 61 L |