1963 DAF 600 vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (102 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 468 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (167 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DAF 600 | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |