1963 DAF 600 vs. 1998 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 1998 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jeep Cherokee (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 800 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jeep Cherokee (194 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 1998 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DAF 600 | 1998 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | DAF | Jeep |
| Model | 600 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2464 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 98.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 81 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2580 mm |
