1963 DAF 600 vs. 2000 Ford Escape
To start off, 2000 Ford Escape is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Escape (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Escape weights approximately 942 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Escape (272 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DAF 600 | 2000 Ford Escape | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 600 | Escape |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 272 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1572 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |