1963 DAF 600 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 645 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DAF 600 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | 600 | Puma |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2450 mm |
