1963 DAF 600 vs. 2000 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Mazda 323 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 323 (74 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 323 weights approximately 517 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 323 (109 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2000 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DAF 600 | 2000 Mazda 323 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 323 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 109 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2850 mm |