1963 DAF 600 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (207 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DAF 600 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |
