1963 DAF 600 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (160 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (230 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DAF 600 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | DAF | Volvo |
| Model | 600 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2670 mm |
